Quality-driven software development
Quality is not a phase. It is what the next change costs.
A team that discovers quality at the end has already paid for it at the beginning, at a worse rate. So the accountability moves left — to the people who can prevent a defect rather than the ones who find it — and the strategy says out loud what is tested, at which level, in which environment, with which tool, and who answers for the result. Testing in production is on that list too: an option with entry conditions, not a confession.
Accountability, from seven different seats
Quality assurance is not a department. It is what changes for everyone who touches the product once the person who can prevent a defect is the person who answers for it.
Areas
Documentation
The test strategy: what quality-driven development commits you to, the nine typologies and what each one can catch, the topologies they run in, and the guidelines for writing a test worth keeping.
Read the strategyCampaigns
The seven campaigns that actually run: continuous, release regression, performance, security, exploratory, in production — and the results they write. Each with a scope, an owner and an exit condition.
Browse the campaigns- Coming soon
MCP
The half of the work a model can do: scaffolding a suite from acceptance criteria, ranking change risk against history, drafting exploratory charters, and writing a performance workload in the DSL.
See what is automated - Coming soon
Academy
Seven learning paths, from why quality is an economic property through choosing a typology and designing a topology to the entry conditions for testing in production.
See the curriculum